Received articles undergo a formal review process to verify that they meet the requirements of the journal. After this formal review, the article proceeds to the (double-blind peer review process). In the event that a reviewer disapproves of the article, a third reviewer is sought, and if they approve, the Editorial Team will make the decision to accept it or not.  The average response time is two months.  Reviewers are selected based on their professional background and experience in the study area and are usually chosen from professionals outside the editorial institution.

Once the external reviewers receive the articles, the evaluation will be carried out following the parameters established in the rubric designed for this purpose

As soon as the external reviewers have the results of the detailed evaluation, each evaluator will present their comments on the corresponding article in writing. Each evaluator will complete the rubric form and will commit not to reproduce the articles or the results of the evaluation through any means.

The article evaluation process includes the following criteria:

1. a.Initial verification of presentation
2. 1. Originality, relevance, and appropriate length of the work
3. 2. Clarity and coherence throughout the structure of the work
4. 3. Adequately elaborated abstract with a length of 150 to 250 words
5. 4. Appropriate logical sequence in the content of the text
6. 5. Compliance with other criteria established in the journal's regulations citations, bibliographic references, etc.).

b.Content review:

1. 1. Evidenced knowledge domain
2. 2. Scientific rigor
3. 3. Adequate theoretical and methodological foundation
4. 4. Currency and relevance of the sources consulted
5. 5. Clear contribution to existing knowledge

In the initial review stage of the formal aspects of the work, if it does not meet the minimum presentation criteria, the Editorial Committee will propose that it is not sent to the double-blind peer review process.

As a result of the double-blind peer review process, the reviewers will issue a verdict indicating one of the descriptors presented below:

1. 1. Accept the submission
2. 2. Publishable with modifications
3. 3. Resubmit for review
4. 4. Resubmit to another publication
5. 5. Not publishable

Authors whose work has been returned with correctable comments will have a maximum of 15 days to respond, which can be extended according to the conditions of proximity or not to the publication date of the Revie issue. In the event that an author loses interest in publishing their work, they must communicate this in writing to the director and/or editor of Revie.

Deadlines:

Initial review:  up to 2 weeks

Blind reviewer assignment: up to 1 month

Acceptance or rejection response: up to 2 months from initial review.